Implant, Crowns & Veneers
Treatment Type
14 Weeks
Treatment Duration
Upper and Lower Arches
Area Treated
19 Veneers, 2 Crowns, 1 Implant Crown
Final Restoration

Last Updated: September 2026

Have your teeth become shorter over the years?

Wear removes length, and shortened teeth account for a great deal of what makes a smile look older than the person wearing it. Restoring the length is what reverses that impression. How much length can be added is determined by the bite, which is why the new proportions are tested in provisional restorations before anything is made definitive. Send us a photo of your smile and we will tell you what is involved.

  • A response within one business day. Usually much sooner.
  • A real cost estimate, not a range designed to get you in the door.
  • No obligation. Many patients take months to decide. That is normal.

Ask about your case

Reviewed by our treatment coordination team. Call or text (310) 770-3335 if you would rather speak now.

Your information is used only to respond to this request. We do not sell or share it.

Request received

Our treatment coordination team will review what you sent and call you within one business day.

If you would like to hold a consultation time now, you can do that below.

Reserve a consultation

Treatment Plan by Dr. Kiyan Mehdizadeh

  • Assessment of the wear across both arches, the drifting and the existing mismatched restorations.
  • Smile design establishing softer, fuller shapes and the length the bite would accommodate.
  • Replacement of a failed root canal in the lower arch with a single implant.
  • Provisional restorations on both arches, worn while the new length was tested.
  • Revision of the provisionals until the shapes and proportions were approved.
  • Nineteen porcelain veneers, two crowns and one implant crown in e.max, twenty-two units.

The Patient's Journey

This patient wanted to look more youthful. She had arrived at that conclusion by noticing two specific changes. Her teeth had become discolored, and they had become visibly shorter. She had also accumulated restorations over the years, placed at different times and by different hands, which no longer matched anything surrounding them.

The photographs show the wear most clearly from the side. The biting edges have flattened and the posterior teeth have darkened. From the front the effect is subtler and harder to attribute, which is the reason patients frequently describe this presentation as looking tired rather than as having worn teeth.

Understanding the Challenge

Wear removes length, and shortened teeth account for a considerable proportion of what makes a smile appear older than the person wearing it. The teeth become squarer, the edges flatten, the smile line loses its curve and progressively less enamel displays when the lips part. Restoring the length is what addresses all four of those consequences simultaneously.

How much length can be restored is determined by the bite rather than by preference. Lengthened teeth have to meet the opposing arch somewhere, and length added beyond what the bite will accommodate is length that fractures or interferes with function. The design therefore proposed an amount and the provisional stage established whether it was tolerable.

The second consideration was the character of the shapes rather than their dimensions. Fuller, brighter teeth on a patient in her sixties can be made to appear conspicuously reconstructed, which is the opposite of looking youthful. The brief was softness and femininity in the outlines, at proportions appropriate to her age rather than borrowed from someone thirty years younger.

There was also one failing tooth. A lower posterior tooth carried a root canal that had failed, and it required replacement before any restorative work above it could be considered finished.

Restore the length the wear had removed, within what the bite would accommodate. Replace the failed root canal with an implant. Design softer, fuller outlines appropriate to her age. Replace the mismatched restorations as part of the same set. Test the new length in provisionals before making anything definitive.

How Dr. Mehdizadeh Approached Treatment

The design established the shapes before any preparation. It corrected the outlines of the worn teeth rather than simply rebuilding them larger. Softer edges, a restored curve to the smile line and proportions consistent with her age were specified deliberately, because fuller and brighter teeth designed without those constraints look reconstructed rather than younger.

The failing lower tooth was removed and replaced with a single implant, which is the appropriate treatment for a tooth carrying a root canal that has already failed rather than a further attempt at restoration. That site healed while the restorative design continued, since the proportions of the remaining twenty-one units could be established from the records without waiting on the bone.

Provisional restorations went onto both arches. She wore them while the new length was tested in ordinary use. This is the stage that decides how much length the case can carry, because a proposed length either functions in speech and eating or announces itself within days. The provisionals were revised, adjusted and reassessed until the shapes and the proportions were approved.

Twenty-two units were then fabricated in e.max: nine porcelain veneers and two crowns in the upper arch, and ten veneers and one implant crown in the lower. The two crowns replaced the mismatched restorations she had accumulated previously, so the older work became part of the new set rather than a visible exception within it. Everything was designed and fabricated in the practice's own laboratory by its master ceramist.

The Result After Fourteen Weeks

The teeth have their length back. The smile line has recovered its curve and the shade is consistent across both arches. Eight appointments across fourteen weeks covered the assessment, the extraction and the implant, the design, the provisional phase and the cementation of all twenty-two units, which is a longer schedule than a veneer case because the implant had to integrate first. The outlines are softer than the worn teeth she arrived with, and appreciably fuller, rather than merely longer.

There is no outstanding treatment. The restorations are ceramic, and how long they last depends on how the bite loads them, so her routine examinations review the bite alongside the gums. That is the same reason the length was tested in provisionals before any of it was made definitive.

Frequently Asked Questions About Worn Teeth, Restoring Length and Age-Appropriate Design

Why do worn teeth make a smile look older?

Because wear removes length. The teeth become squarer, the biting edges flatten, the smile line loses its curve and progressively less enamel displays when the lips part. Restoring the length addresses all four consequences at once.

How much length can be added?

As much as the bite will accommodate, which is assessed rather than chosen. Lengthened teeth have to meet the opposing arch, and length added beyond what the bite tolerates is length that fractures or interferes with function.

How do you establish what the bite will tolerate?

The design proposes an amount and the provisional restorations establish whether it works. A proposed length either functions in speech and eating or announces itself within days, which is why nothing was made definitive until the provisionals had been worn.

Can restorations look youthful without looking obvious?

That is largely a question of outline rather than shade. Fuller, brighter teeth designed without regard to age can appear conspicuously reconstructed. Here the outlines were specified as softer and the proportions were kept appropriate to her, rather than borrowed from a much younger patient.

What was wrong with the existing restorations?

They had been placed over a number of years and no longer matched the teeth surrounding them. Two were replaced as part of this treatment, so the older work became part of the new set rather than a visible exception within it.

Why did one tooth need an implant?

A lower posterior tooth carried a root canal that had failed. A tooth in that condition is replaced rather than restored again, and the implant was placed before the restorative work above it was completed.

Why were both arches treated?

Because the wear was present in both and the two arches meet each other. Restoring length in one arch against worn opposing teeth leaves the new restorations meeting surfaces that are still the wrong shape.

What is the difference between a veneer and a crown here?

A veneer rebuilds the visible surface of a tooth that retains enough sound structure. A crown covers the whole tooth, which is what the two previously restored teeth required. Both were made in the same material and designed as part of one set.

Is there anything left to do after treatment?

No further treatment. The restorations are ceramic, and how long they last depends on how the bite loads them, so the routine examinations review the bite as well as the gums.

How much does a full mouth restoration like this cost?

This case was $52,000, covering the assessment and design, one extraction, one implant, one implant crown, two crowns and nineteen porcelain veneers. Implants with crowns range from $4,000 to $6,000 per site and individual ceramic restorations from $1,800 to $3,500 per tooth, so the total depends chiefly on how many teeth require restoring. Financing options are available and a detailed breakdown is provided at the consultation.

Last Updated: September 2026

Dr. Kiyan Mehdizadeh, DMD — cosmetic dentist in Beverly Hills

Dr. Kiyan Mehdizadeh, DMD

Doctor of Dental Medicine

Most cosmetic dentists refer out for surgery. Most surgeons don't do cosmetic work. Dr. Mehdizadeh trained in both — implantology and bone grafting at Loma Linda and UCLA, fixed prosthodontics under Mauro Fradeani in Italy, periodontal microsurgery with Hürzeler and Zuhr in Munich, and IV sedation at the University of Alabama. That combination means complex cases involving surgery, grafting, implants, and restorative work are planned and executed by a single provider with full command of every phase.

Technical skill produces function. Taste is what produces beauty. The difference between dental work that looks like dental work and a result that looks entirely natural comes down to aesthetic judgment — proportion, texture, translucency, how light moves across a surface. That sensibility runs through everything here, from the way cases are designed to the office itself.

An in-house master ceramist and on-site laboratory allow restorations to be designed, fabricated, and refined with direct collaboration between doctor and technician — no outsourced lab work, no guesswork, no compromise on the final product. Dr. Mehdizadeh is one of few dentists with the refined ability to provide care across multiple specialties, resulting in cohesive and holistic outcomes.

Education & Credentials

  • Doctor of Dental Medicine (DMD), cum laude — Boston University
  • Bachelor of Science in Biology — Emory University
  • Mastership in Implant Dentistry & Grafting — Loma Linda University / gIDE Institute
  • Advanced Implant Therapy & Grafting — UCLA / gIDE Institute
  • Implant Placement & Restoration — UCLA / Nobel Biocare
  • Guided Bone Regeneration & Ridge Augmentation — gIDE Institute
  • Sinus Elevation & Augmentation — gIDE Institute
  • Soft Tissue Management & Grafting — gIDE Institute
  • Minimally Invasive Augmentation & Autogenous Bone Management — IDEA, San Francisco
  • Master Program in Fixed Prosthodontics — Fradeani Education, Italy
  • Aesthetic Dentistry — UCLA School of Dentistry
  • Advanced Occlusion & Bite Design — UCLA
  • Periodontal Micro-Surgery — Hürzeler/Zuhr, Munich
  • Micro-Endodontic Training — University of Pennsylvania
  • IV Sedation — University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Injectable Therapy for TMJ & Facial Pain — American Academy of Facial Esthetics

Considering similar treatment?

Send Dr. Mehdizadeh a photo and ask what’s possible for your case.